Hey there! My name is Anson and I work on the Platform team at Artsy. Recently, we faced an issue where a certain Enzyme test we wrote using mock tracking was failing, but we couldn't figure out why. Luckily, with some help from Orta and some clever thinking, we figured out what was going on.
We thought it was an issue with the mock testing library we had written. We tried to fix the problem by sprinkling
console.log calls throughout the test, but it was still hard to figure out what was going on, especially without knowing how to peek into the properties of certain objects.
Instead, Orta suggested we used the Chrome Node DevTools. Since the Enzyme test is run via
yarn jest, yarn is acting as a frontend for running the Enzyme test with Node. This means that we can use the Chrome Node DevTools as a debugger to run the Enzyme test. This was super useful since the one thing we needed was to be able to peek inside certain objects to see what they looked like and how they were failing. It was a much faster, more methodical way to approach debugging this test. Here are the steps we took:
- First, insert a new line in your test where you think it might be failing and type
debugger. This will serve as a break point for the debugger to stop at.
- Open up Chrome and type in the address bar :
- Click on "Open dedicated DevTools for Node"
- In your terminal, instead of typing
yarn jest <path_to_test>, type this:
Or you can add it to your
package.json as a script:
1 2 3 4 5
Which you can then run as
yarn test:debug <path_to_test>.
Voila! Your test should now be running in the Chrome debugger. And you get your handy console to poke around all sorts of stuff!
You also have the option of using this with Jest's
--watch mode in order easily re-run tests, after changes to app or test code.
Now simply hit Enter in the terminal running your Jest process anytime you want to re-run your currently selected specs. You'll be dropped right back into the Chrome debugger.
You might be wondering how this fixed our tests. Well, turns out that we missed a
jest.unmock() call at the top of the test file. Facepalm. To prevent this from biting other developers in the future, Orta whipped up a pull request to add a rule in our TypeScript linter, check it out!
Either way, in the future, this will probably be my first step in debugging non-obvious issues in tests, if only to eliminate possible sources of the issues. I'm glad I was able to learn with Orta about a methodical way to debug test failures. Hope this helps, and happy hacking!